The best summary of the situation here may be that the lead coverage on Egypt’s ban of David Kirkpatrick is Al Jazeera, the Qatari terrorist propaganda network that is interlinked with promoting the Muslim Brotherhood.
The New York Times hack has many low points in his career. But a particular low point came when he tried to perpetuate the “Benghazi was just a YouTube protest hoax” right when it was coming apart.
This is an embarrassing moment in Kirkpatrick’s career of shamelessly shilling for Jihadists that he would rather forget.
The chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee said that key conclusions of a recent New York Times investigation into the 2012 Benghazi attack are wrong.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) rejected the Times’s conclusion that al Qaeda wasn’t responsible for the attack that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. She also took issue with the notion that the Libya strike was sparked by a U.S.-made anti-Islam video online.
“I believe that groups loosely associated with al Qaeda were” involved in the attack, she told The Hill last week. “That’s my understanding.”
She also disputed the notion that the Sept. 11, 2012, assault evolved from a protest against the video, which was widely disseminated by Islamic clerics shortly before the attack.
“It doesn’t jibe with me,” she said.
Read the full story from Front Page Mag
Want more BFT? Leave us a voicemail on our page or follow us on Twitter @BFT_Podcast and Facebook @BluntForceTruthPodcast. We want to hear from you! There’s no better place to get the #BluntForceTruth.
