In September 2018, the New York Times published an opinion piece by someone identified only as “Anonymous.” Anonymous claimed that he and “like-minded” colleagues ostensibly served President Trump but were actually answering a higher calling by actively working against the President’s agenda. Anonymous even got a book deal out of this “confession.” On Monday, former U.S. Attorney Joe diGenova claimed to have heard from a senior White House official that Anonymous now has a name and will be fired.
On September 5, 2018, there was a startling headline in the New York Times: “I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration: I work for the president but like-minded colleagues and I have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.”
The New York Times supported withholding this brave resistance fighter’s name because the person’s job “would be jeopardized by its disclosure.” In other words, the situation was almost exactly the same as a resistance fighter in occupied Poland or France during WWII, who might have been tortured and executed if that person’s identity had become known.
Read the full story from American Thinker
Want more BFT? Leave us a voicemail on our page or follow us on Twitter @BFT_Podcast and Facebook @BluntForceTruthPodcast. We want to hear from you! There’s no better place to get the #BluntForceTruth.