It’s undeniable the mainstream media was in the bag for Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election, despite her recent assertions reporters were against her.
Journalists are now openly admitting they provided favorable coverage for the losing candidate.
New York Times reporter Amy Chozick, who is now cashing in on her coverage of Clinton with a new book, told ABC’s “This Week” today that she “tried to write very sympathetic biographical features” that would inevitably boost Hillary’s prospects.
Video: @NYTimes reporter @AmyChozick boasted on #ThisWeek that during 2016 campaign she “tried to write very sympathetic biographical features” about Hillary Clinton. #TTT pic.twitter.com/oERHI7UY0c
— Brent Baker (@BrentHBaker) April 22, 2018
Chozick lamented that it was difficult to get pro-Hillary stories to break through.
“In fairness, we covered all of her policies and I tried to write very sympathetic biographical features.
“The perfect example is I wrote this sympathetic […]
Want more BFT? Leave us a voicemail on our page or follow us on Twitter @BFT_Podcast and Facebook @BluntForceTruthPodcast. We want to hear from you! There’s no better place to get the #BluntForceTruth.
